Sunday, 25 July 2021

Sunday July 25th 2021

08:00 Lois and I are in bed. She has had a disturbed night with a tummy bug, however, so I leave her to wake up gracefully while I go downstairs and make a cup of tea for us both, even though it's not strictly my turn - I'm all heart haha!

10:00 My sister Gill texts me. She and I are trying to find out more information about 2 "lost cousins", both adopted as babies, that we knew nothing about until a few weeks ago, when Gill sent her DNA to a database and got her results back. 

a typical case of a "lost cousin": Barack Obama's long-lost cousin from Ireland

One of these "lost cousins" of ours, David, is a BBC journalist, and he's going to be ringing Gill on Wednesday for a preliminary chat. Up to now they've only corresponded by text or email. But Gill and I are going to have to have a chat ourselves before that phone-call, because although David obviously wants to know all about his "real family", there are some things that Gill and I are not allowed to tell him at the moment, to protect some of our other relatives' "sensibilities" - oh dear, yes, it's soap-opera land all right haha!!!

Gill and I have also identified the other "lost cousin", Jonathan, who we think is either a brother or half-brother of David, the journalist. But we can't get in touch with Jonathan at the moment because of those self-same "sensibilities" - what madness !!!! Jonathan has lived in Spain for at least 10 years: we know he was born in 1949, although mysteriously we can't find a birth record for him.

a typical pair of half-brothers (extreme left and right)
from the 2016 film of that name

Jonathan was adopted as a baby by a couple who couldn't have children, and so, over the years, they decided to adopt not only Jonathan but also 6 other children. We can't find a birth record for Jonathan, but Gill wondered if he was given a different name at birth, and then renamed by his foster-parents. And Gill has today found a possible candidate born in 1949 in Bristol, the city where his foster-parents were living at the time. His mother's name fits the bill and his first name was the same as that of mine and Gill's maternal grandfather, so it could all fit. The plot thickens haha!

10:30 Lois disappears into the dining-room to log in to "zoom" and take part in the first of her sect's 2 worship services today. Today is a big day for the sect, because they're inaugurating a return to in-person religious services, in a rented hall just outside Tewkesbury. The majority of members, however, are, this Sunday, still going to take part remotely using the zoom software: this includes all the 4 anti-vax couples, who will all be taking part remotely, which will be nice for everybody present in the hall, to put it mildly haha!!!!

Some members are going to be there, however, and the visiting speaker is going to be there also. Lois tells me later than on the laptop she can see the platform in the meeting-room, with the speaker and the president, and also the screen used for slide presentations, but she doesn't see the audience in the hall. She can, however, see the other zoom participants, including herself, around the sides of the screen, which is nice.

The sect's local elders have been putting a lot of time in during the past week getting the hall ready, with tables arranged at good social distances from each other, lots of hand gel etc. Members will sit with their partners or with buddies in their "bubble", without wearing masks, but they will have to put ona masks if they leave their tables to walk around and socialise.

flashback to earlier this week: the elders have got the meeting-room ready 
for the services due to be held today

16:00 Lois and I settle down on the couch with a cup of tea and a currant-bun. I look at my smartphone and I see with delight, that one of our favourite quora forum pundits, Matt Riggsby (normal name with crazy spelling, crazy guy!) has been weighing in on the vexed question of why the Ancient Egyptians took so long to start using wheels and axles.

the debonair Matt Riggsby, one of our favourite quora pundits


Matt points out that wheels are not as obvious or as useful an invention as we tend to think they are.

Matt writes, "The idea that the wheel is the first, simplest, most basic, and/or most important of technological developments is a modern stereotype which is not borne out by the history of technology. It would appear that the wheel, as a device for transportation, was invented probably once in conditions favouring it and spread from there, and even that developed fairly late relative to other fundamental inventions like fire, stone tools, rope and cord, sewing, timekeeping, agriculture, and the domestication of animals, and around the same time as civilization and writing.

"The wheel is actually fairly complicated, a series of inventions rather than one. First, you need to make something round and sturdy but not too heavy, which is harder than it looks. The first pottery wheels, which appeared several thousand years before wheels for transportation, were made of stone or ceramic, which would be terrible for use on a vehicle. They turned slowly on pivots rather than quickly in a bearing, making them useful for making symmetrical pottery but not obviously good for much else.

"To turn that wheel into something useful for carrying loads, you then need to get at least two of them and put them on an axle, then put that axle in some kind of bearing which allows it to rotate more or less freely, and then attach some kind of framework to that bearing to carry loads. And on top of that, you need hard, level ground for your vehicle to travel on. Mesopotamia and other regions of southwestern and central Asia had that, but many other places (notably Egypt) didn’t.

"And even then, wheeled vehicles are poor transportation compared to transport by water. Historically, carrying things over land by cart costs four or five times as much as transporting by river (and twenty or so times as much as transporting them by sea). So if you’re Egyptian, where everywhere you’d ever want to go is right there on the Nile, there’s little point in investing in clumsy, difficult, expensive early wheels.

"What seems to have happened, then, is that wheels were developed by people who could have a use for them. Central Asia and the parts of Mesopotamia not directly on the Tigris and Euphrates are fairly free of convenient rivers and streams and have the kind of ground wheels are good on. They also had good beast of burden (horses and oxen) available to provide labour for pulling them. Only once those early, not-very-good-wheeled vehicles had developed into better versions like war chariots did that technology start to spread elsewhere, like eventually into Egypt and China. And that’s why the civilizations of the New World in mountainous Peru and moist, hilly Yucatan and southern Mexico never bothered with wheels."

Fred Flintstone (right) showcases an early Stone Age car

No wonder, however, that although the wheel, strictly speaking, was only invented once and patented once, it had, as we know, to be constantly "re-invented" because people lost the plans for it, and had to start again. Although I think that the original inventor still got paid sixpence (2.5p in new money) every time somebody used his idea, which seems fair!

But what a crazy world we live in !!!!!

18:00 Steve, our American brother-in-law, has sent us a news quiz from the Guardian newspaper. One of the 15 questions is about Peppa Pig TV-cartoons.

a quiz question from this week's Guardian newspaper

Lois and I get the right answer on this one, which is nice. It seems an unlikely answer, but luckily we had previously read about this phenomenon in Lois's copy of "The Week" magazine.


What can I say, except, perhaps, "What a crazy world we live in !!!!!" ?

20:00 We watch a bit of TV, an interesting first programme in a new series of "Secrets of the Museum", about work done at the Victoria & Albert Museum on restoring and preserving ageing exhibits.


It's nice tonight to see Slade guitarist Jim Lea's red lurex suit being lovingly restored. Lois was a big Slade fan in the 1970's, and has always had a bit of a mega-crush on the group's leader and lead singer, Walsall-born "Noddy" Holder. 

flashback to 1971, when Slade were having their big breakthrough:
guitarist Jim Lea is on the left; lead singer Noddy is 3rd from left

Jim was the serious musician in the group - he co-wrote most of their many hit songs, and had trained as a classical violinist. Now aged 72, he says tonight that his mother never forgave him for not ending up playing in a proper orchestra, but that she had now, in her 90's, at last relented after hearing that his old red lurex suit was going to be displayed at the V&A.

What madness !!!!!!


Jim Lea, as he is today - he thoroughly approves of the museum's 
conservation work on his suit, no doubt about that!

22:00 We go to bed - zzzzzzzz!!!!!


No comments:

Post a Comment