Friends, here's a "doozy" of a question that I've got ready for you this morning - are YOU dissatisfied with the services of your local NHS Hospital Trust?
Most of us are pretty unhappy about it at the moment aren't we. Sometimes it seems like we, the patients, are just here to serve the medical community rather than vice-versa, which purists are now saying is "the wrong way round". And it's glaringly obvious that the complaints in our local Onion News are becoming middling-to-frequent, on some days almost "legion" (!). Did you see this shocker in this morning's print edition (p.94) ?
Those headlines make pretty shocking reading, don't they, and my medium-to-long-suffering wife Lois and I try not to think about them this afternoon, as we wait in our local NHS doctor's surgery for the practice nurse to give Lois some routine tests.
We try to take our minds off the current press "furore", by regaling the other patients in the waiting-area with boasts about our daily walk this morning by the Worcester-Hereford railway line - we're anxious to tell the we saw a record 3 trains passing, indicating that local scare-stories about train cancellations are just "a bunch of hooey" (!).
See what I did there? Sheer genius isn't it - no wonder I'm praised so much locally, "in these here parts", as people say "in these here parts" (!).
[That's not what I've heard! - Ed]
21:00 Lois and I go to bed on an interesting TV documentary all about beloved actor Jason Watkins' discovery that he had not just one but two ancestors in charge of prisoners in the Tower of London, at various times in the 16th and 17th centuries.
It was time of bitter religious conflict and bigotry between Catholic and Protestants, but it's heart-warming to learn that Watkins' ancestors found it in their hearts to put all that aside and be nice to their prisoners occasionally, allowing them special privileges they weren't supposed to be enjoying.
Awwww!!!!
The first of these two ancestors of Jason' was John Brydges, who was Lieutenant of the Tower when the Catholic Queen Mary locked up her Protestant sister, Princess Elizabeth - the future Elizabeth I, putting her under Brydges's supervision. The charge was that Elizabeth was plotting against the Queen to take the throne for herself.
Apparently Brydges had a heart of gold, however, and so he wasn't too hard on the young 20-year-old princess in his charge, which is nice to hear. Historian Tracy Borman explains that Brydges gave the young princess privileges that he wasn't supposed to grant. Elizabeth was allowed to exercise, for example, and to leave her apartments to walk along the walls.
Apparently, food prepared in the Tower's kitchens was a bit "rubbish". Oh dear! And I expect Brydges himself was fed up with it, so this would have been a good excuse for him too to be eating something a bit nicer for once.
Poor Brydges!!!
However, there was a nasty surprise still to come for Brydges, because when the Constable of the Tower found about these secret "gourmet dinners for two", Brydges got the sack.
"But why was that a catastrophic mistake, Colin?", I hear you cry. [Not me, I've given up on this blog post and gone to bed! - Ed]
No comments:
Post a Comment